This version of the Plan

Object

Representation ID: 4688

Received: 09/08/2025

Respondent: Miss Christine Curtis

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Has the housing need locally been really verified.?

Support

Representation ID: 4706

Received: 09/08/2025

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

This version is ok

Object

Representation ID: 4947

Received: 11/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Stockey

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Whilst the preparatory work has included a strategic transport assessment the council has conducted neither an air quality impact assessment or and equalities impact assessment. The developments already being proposed for Rainham of 750 houses, two schools and no extra curricular support for the extra young people (and at the expense of over 20,000 trees) which provide the the “ lungs of Rainham “ are an example of the concentration of development at to damage the health and cultural heritage of Rainham - this isn’t a plan it’s a sacrifice.

Object

Representation ID: 4996

Received: 11/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Wade

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

On asking why we have not had notification of any plans, even though we live at Gibraltar Farm, we were told that ‘oh it must be because the development is called Gibraltar Farm so assumed you knew’.
Is it any wonder that we don’t feel listened to. It doesn’t matter how many years local residents have been saying they don’t agree with plans for development , our views are totally disregarded. When MC have agreed with us , central government imposed their will. We have followed the democratic but a dictatorial approach by CG has quashed that democracy.