This document sets out the

Object

Representation ID: 4474

Received: 03/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Mark Hewer

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The plan to include SA10 does nothing to preserve the environment of hundreds of acres of orchards/agricultural land.

Support

Representation ID: 4707

Received: 09/08/2025

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

More is required for infrastructure especially in rural areas without increasing development /houses

Support

Representation ID: 4912

Received: 11/08/2025

Respondent: F D Attwood and Partners

Agent: Hume Planning Consultancy Ltd

F D Attwood and Partners support the vision, development requirement of the plan and the spatial strategy which includes the Capstone corridor as a strategic location for meeting Medway's growth. The land within the Attwood's control affords opportunities for comprehensive masterplanning alongside the delivery of key infrastructure and green infrastructure links with Capstone Country Park and Darland Banks beyond. The majority of the strategic corridor is within single family landownership control and is available and deliverable within the plan period alongside the Lidsing Garden Community to the south.

Support

Representation ID: 4915

Received: 11/08/2025

Respondent: F D Attwood and Partners

Agent: Hume Planning Consultancy Ltd

It is recognised that the Medway Landscape Assessment forms part of the evidence base of the local plan and that green and blue infrastructure corridors are set out at Figure 2 of Page 42. For clarity Policy S5 should reference within its wording "having regard to the strategic allocations" so development within these areas is acknowledged and there is consistency between the policies. This is recognised elsewhere at Para 4.6.11.

Object

Representation ID: 5004

Received: 11/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Wade

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

I don't believe the research for this plan has been thorough and unbiased. I believe has been strategic and made to fit a preconceived plan.
Maps provided are unclear with helpful information that could be used by the viewer to place themselves within the map greyed out. Policies and the written word associated with the maps were unclear and council staff sent to presentations to answer questions were unable or unwilling to answer questions. Policies attached to the council website are not written to be readily understood by the average reader.