14.1.5
Object
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 19, 2025)
Representation ID: 4449
Received: 30/07/2025
Respondent: Mr Stuart Lowther
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Following consultation events for Local Plan and former Orchard site I wish to object in the strongest possible manner to the extent of development of good Agricultural land and our open spaces.
Why rename the Orchards, Rainham Parkside Village, other than to pretend it is somehow different to the site refused by Medway and the planning inspectorate. The current council is being politically opportunist in trying to circumvent the outcome of proper planning process of 20/21.
The plan should be thrown out as none of the valid reasons for refusal have change apart from a small reduction in unit numbers.
Object
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 19, 2025)
Representation ID: 4809
Received: 10/08/2025
Respondent: Mrs Alison Stiling
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Strood west parcels 1-4 do not have the infrastructure to cope with such large developments.
The fuel pipeline runs along the back of the field and should not be built on or around.
Object
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 19, 2025)
Representation ID: 4810
Received: 10/08/2025
Respondent: Mrs Hazel Wiggins
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Strood West Parcel 1-4 does not have the infrastructure to cope with such a large development.
The pipeline that runs north of Rede Court Road and beyond should not be built upon.
Object
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 19, 2025)
Representation ID: 4971
Received: 11/08/2025
Respondent: Mr H Fitzpatrick
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Plans to access the disused Gillingham Dockyard railway line cross my property.
I request to be in direct consultation on how the plans impact my property.