14.1.5

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 19, 2025)

Representation ID: 4449

Received: 30/07/2025

Respondent: Mr Stuart Lowther

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Following consultation events for Local Plan and former Orchard site I wish to object in the strongest possible manner to the extent of development of good Agricultural land and our open spaces.
Why rename the Orchards, Rainham Parkside Village, other than to pretend it is somehow different to the site refused by Medway and the planning inspectorate. The current council is being politically opportunist in trying to circumvent the outcome of proper planning process of 20/21.
The plan should be thrown out as none of the valid reasons for refusal have change apart from a small reduction in unit numbers.

Object

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 19, 2025)

Representation ID: 4809

Received: 10/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alison Stiling

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Strood west parcels 1-4 do not have the infrastructure to cope with such large developments.

The fuel pipeline runs along the back of the field and should not be built on or around.

Object

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 19, 2025)

Representation ID: 4810

Received: 10/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Hazel Wiggins

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Strood West Parcel 1-4 does not have the infrastructure to cope with such a large development.
The pipeline that runs north of Rede Court Road and beyond should not be built upon.

Object

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 19, 2025)

Representation ID: 4971

Received: 11/08/2025

Respondent: Mr H Fitzpatrick

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Plans to access the disused Gillingham Dockyard railway line cross my property.

I request to be in direct consultation on how the plans impact my property.