14.11.9

Object

Representation ID: 4329

Received: 30/06/2025

Respondent: Mr David Hillery

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

My family's home life will be significantly affected by the proposals. Our house has enjoyed unobstructed views over orchards and fields for hundreds of years. You now propose to replace this with housing and a local centre.
You suggest the development will have regard for the listed buildings. However, the 'setting' of a listed building is an important element. The removal of the farmland will have a significantly adverse impact on the setting.
I cannot understand why an almost identical planning application rejected by the planning inspectorate less than five years ago is now proposed by the local authority.

Support

Representation ID: 4415

Received: 26/07/2025

Respondent: Mrs Clare Marshall

Where is rthe detail for RES10?

Object

Representation ID: 4489

Received: 03/08/2025

Respondent: Mr Mark Hewer

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Making the bottom end of Pump Lane 'one way' shows the complete disregard for exisitng residents in the area when planning new development. In this case residents who are within a stones throw from home travelling North could have their journeys significantly extended by being diverted through the new estate and via the lower rainham road which is usually backed up at peak hours and has already been assessed as being significantly worse following the new development.