Securing jobs and developing skills for a competitive economy

Showing comments and forms 31 to 56 of 56

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1040

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Crombie

Representation Summary:

Chatham Docks must be left as Chatham Docks!! There is much reference to Medway's heritage, river and waterfront potential in the proposed plan. It should not be the case that all waterfront land be turned over to residential use. You contemplate improving river usage for transport then do away with Chatham Docks?
To improve outcomes for employment, the plan must include provision for youth groups. Little support is shown for the sterling work of Scouts, Sea Cadets, Chatham Royal Marine Cadets, Girl Guides etc... These groups nurture our future and more encouragement and support should be forthcoming.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1061

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Medway Green Party

Representation Summary:

There are numerous opportunities for Medway to develop green technologies and innovations working closely with the Universities. The developments in Medway must reflect the ambition to achieve ever greener technologies that will make the dwellings of Medway residents more comfortable and affordable.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1107

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Brunel Planning

Representation Summary:

The current plan protects existing employment uses for Chatham Docks (Policy ED1,Policy ED9).

If the Council is truly seeking to promote businesses and jobs then these protective policies specific to Chatham Docks must be carried forward into the new Plan.

Chatham Docks employs local people reliant on its operation for their livelihoods.

It is a sustainable operation taking full advantage of the dockside access. The dock use cannot be re-located, there is no other suitable site in Medway for its operation.

It mustnot be lost and redeveloped for housing. The dock must be protected.

See full representations sent by email.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1124

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Medway Council Climate Response Team

Representation Summary:

Consider expanding on the sentence “Build on existing strengths and expertise, such as engineering, energy and creative industries, and raise the profile of key sectors, to attract and develop the skills and jobs of the future required to enable the vision for example, skills to enable low carbon resilient developments£.
We welcome the inclusion of green tourism as a consideration. Noting, however, that tourism itself is likely to be adversely affected by the impacts of climate change. For example, shifting of wildlife habitats.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1155

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Stuart Tranter

Representation Summary:

An obvious Medway advantage is to use the River and Maritime opportunities, including supporting marine renewable energy opportunities. This can be linked to our local further and higher education facilities. The council must under no circumstances allow residential development on land which has obvious marine potential, such as Chatham Docks.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1177

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Redrow Homes Limited

Agent: Ms Emily Brosnan

Representation Summary:

The proposed development at the site, at High Halstow will generate a range of economic benefits, including new employment opportunities, both during the construction and operational phases.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1189

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Stephen Hesketh

Representation Summary:

Sound decisions need to be made and these need to be seen through. It is obvious that shopping methods have significantly changed. This has left high streets (particularly Chatham & Gillingham) a complete eyesore and not fit for purpose. It will need compulsory purchases and bold decision making to get this right, but it is obvious we do not need the full lengths of these 2 town centres. People joke about visiting them and most don't bother. Areas, such as the stretch opposite Gillingham Library need revamping (several of the buildings here have been derelict for decades)

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1220

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Railfuture Ltd

Representation Summary:

We endorse the above objective and in particular its penultimate sub-section in relation to the infrastructure needed to provide accessible employment locations.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1277

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: David Hopkins

Representation Summary:

I agree with these objectives.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1278

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Helen Hopkins

Representation Summary:

There are some positive ideas here however there needs to be jobs for all levels, as well s graduates. so those less academically able.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1281

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Bryan Fowler

Representation Summary:

State specific importance of construction industry including by raising standards, recognise importance of good quality housing especially

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1319

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Tony Clark

Representation Summary:

Nice words, but no proof. The highsteets are dieing, the majority of shopping is online and the influx of these oppourtunities mentioned have no proof they will happen

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1321

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Claire Friday

Representation Summary:

Building new unaffordable homes doesn’t develop skills for a competitive economy. More needs to be done to improve the quality of life and surrounding of the already existing deprived areas in the Medway Towns and getting unemployment rates down.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1327

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Alexandra Hall

Representation Summary:

Building more houses means there will be more people needing jobs and education etc putting a strain on local funding which is already grossly overspent . When the building stops they will just be unemployed unless the council will just continue to build until they no longer need to work. There is no guarantee that those building will be from the local area many come from over parts of the uk and Europe . No guarantee they will all be Medway residents

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1345

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Elizabeth Turpin

Representation Summary:

It is important to protect the jobs and industries that already exist in Medway. Chatham Docks is under threat by Peel Ports wanting to convert that areas into mixed development. Peel Ports have already built flats on part of their land and the rest of Chatham Docks should be protected and allows to remain as a working dock. Business cannot just move to any piece of land when they are reliant on the river. I strongly oppose this area having the land designation changed.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1371

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes

Agent: Iceni Projects

Representation Summary:

Past under delivery of housing have meant that it is entirely necessary to meet the demands of the future, drive up quantum as well as quality and support wider investment in services, businesses and infrastructure.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1406

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Marilyn Stone

Representation Summary:

In addition to the above objectives I would add taking the opportunity to develop green technologies and close working with our universities.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1413

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Ms Bridget Fox (Woodland Trust)

Representation Summary:

We recommend adding a reference to the green economy alongside green tourism, in particular silviculture, once an important part of Kent's economy. We need a new generation of tree nurseries supplying UK sourced and grown tree stock for new planting, to support biodiversity and resilience.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1418

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Alexander Cameron

Representation Summary:

To enable that competitive economy, we need to innovate and build the essential supporting infrastructure at local level as well as across the town, creating an environment of opportunities that can deliver that economic powerhouse that will fund this plan as part of a business plan for Medway.

This means letting go of our current silo thinking, connecting, and joining today's strands and enabling new strands of opportunity to flourish inside a farmwork that welcome and promotes delivering creative new enterprises (human scale).

Creativity and heritage are vital elements of our shared future and enable our diverse cultural landscape.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1427

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Church Commissioners for England .

Agent: Lichfields

Representation Summary:

See covering letter submitted by Lichfields on behalf of CCE via email.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1474

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Locate in Kent

Representation Summary:

Medway is the economic powerhouse for Kent. To sustain this, it needs more space for industrial employment land, largely but exclusively, for logistics.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1522

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Catesby Estates

Agent: Mr Craig Pettit

Representation Summary:

Marrons on behalf of Catesby Estates in relation to chapter 4 'Securing jobs and developing skills for a competitive economy' of the consultation document.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1527

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Sheila Pinkstone

Representation Summary:

The tourism aspect must show how it will benefit the local economy, as in the recent winery application for a winery and visitors centre at Cuxton was initially approved but then turned down. There was no evidence supplied to show that visitors would spend money outside the winery so tourism would only benefit the winery. The sites of these is Important if tourism is to support the local economy,

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1632

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Roger Brown

Representation Summary:

The priority must be a huge improvement in skills training. Companies will move to any area with a highly trained workforce.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1704

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin

Representation Summary:

The plans to develop the Chatham docks will lead to a loss of many jobs- whatever the land owners say, and this is being done for profit
And against the skill set of Medway and its people. The innovation centre has cost millions and not produced a single job and is years behind the times. It has been a waste of public funds however the Kingsnorth site is a good idea and is industry led. The message seems to be to listen to those companies that are producing jobs and know what the market is avoid siren calls of developers

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1729

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Trevor East

Representation Summary:

With so many FE and HE establishments in the area, explore opportunities to retain these future innovators amd leaders in the area, with a view to encouraging them to develop sustainable work-based projects for local communities.