5.8

Comment

Representation ID: 379

Received: 02/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Nicholas Dowling

As of this weekend reports in the National media are picking up that Governmental support for the Lower Thames Crossing is waning. This could have enormous implications on road capacity and the general environment that the Local Plan is developed within. The progress of the LTC should be monitored as the plan progresses.

Comment

Representation ID: 399

Received: 03/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Stephen Dyke

It is to be hoped that in the present financial climate, the LTC will not go ahead. The Local Plan should recognise this possibility. If it does go ahead the Local Plan should seek ways to actively mitigate its substantial environmental impact (which will be felt, especially in Strood, Frindsbury and Wainscott.

Comment

Representation ID: 677

Received: 26/10/2023

Respondent: Ms Catriona Jamieson

Feels like this scheme is lacking in proving sustainability and maybe should not be going ahead?

Comment

Representation ID: 852

Received: 28/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison

Understood.

Comment

Representation ID: 923

Received: 28/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Keith Clear

We need to be looking at greener alternatives

Comment

Representation ID: 985

Received: 29/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Leslie Brown

The Transportation Model and funding stream has to be applauded. The Transportation Consultant will support any such measures.

Comment

Representation ID: 1054

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Crombie

I think a lower Thames crossing is a good idea.

Comment

Representation ID: 1297

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: David Hopkins

Agree.

Comment

Representation ID: 1462

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Alexander Cameron

We should be firmly rejecting the LTC as we move away from high density road traffic based infrastructure.