5.10

Showing comments and forms 1 to 15 of 15

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 421

Received: 06/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Jill Norton

Representation Summary:

and yet many of your proposals especially on the Hoo Peninsula ignore the environmental impact. This is ironic at best.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 529

Received: 20/10/2023

Respondent: Francesca Baylis

Representation Summary:

Mitigation of increased traffic should include protection of green belt land to provide a buffer for air pollution. The LTC says they dont need to account for air quality because cars will be moving to electric vehicles but as government have delayed this, this is a serious concern.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 619

Received: 25/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis

Representation Summary:

All green belt areas, AONB, ancient woodland and protected landscapes should not be considered for development. Once they are built on they are lost to future generations for ever.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 642

Received: 25/10/2023

Respondent: Kent Downs AONB Unit

Representation Summary:

It is unlikely that potential impacts on designated landscapes such as the AONB could be mitigated through the delivery of new services.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 741

Received: 26/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Dan Dickinson

Representation Summary:

How does delivering a new service mitigate the damage to the environment?

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 831

Received: 27/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Brian McDonald

Representation Summary:

Please avoid diluting or undermining protected landscapes and sites. The AONB, countryside and waterways are assets of importance for well being, sense of place, and key to securing investment. Don’t trash these in the rush to secure targets or from brown nosing billionaires.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 854

Received: 28/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison

Representation Summary:

Has serious consideration been given to be given to on-going sea level rise and its impact on designated habitats and landscapes over a much longer period than the Local Plan, measured and modelled over centuries rather than decades, and more in keeping with the useful life expectancy of buildings. A large part of Medway forms part of the London flood plain and is considered expendable by higher authority.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 925

Received: 28/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Keith Clear

Representation Summary:

As a resident we trust you to safeguard and look after those key areas of heritage, historical and environmental areas.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 987

Received: 29/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Leslie Brown

Representation Summary:

The Government NPPF changes and nil impact, bird boxes, hedgehog runs, trees, will force volume builders to provide mitigation.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1072

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Medway Green Party

Representation Summary:

Serious consideration needs to be given to on-going sea level rise and its impact on designated habitats and landscapes over a much longer period than the Local Plan, measured and modelled over centuries rather than decades, and more in keeping with the useful life expectancy of buildings. A large part of Medway forms part of the London flood plain and is considered expendable by higher authority.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1299

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: David Hopkins

Representation Summary:

Agree.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1465

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Alexander Cameron

Representation Summary:

This section contains no information, what is the plan?

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1471

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Marilyn Stone

Representation Summary:

Perhaps not just further but very serious and longer term consideration.
It seems we are part of the London Flood Plan an less of a concern than other areas.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1510

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Richborough

Agent: Pinnacle Planning

Representation Summary:

The ability to deliver significant levels of residential development sustainably alongside ecological designations will need to be evidenced. Richborough is of the view that the second stage of the Land Availability Assessment (LAA) will need to assess how the residential development of each site can viably protect against the erosion of these features and Medway Council should look to develop a site selection methodology which prioritises sites which minimise impact on these key ecological designations.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1718

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin

Representation Summary:

The Hoo peninsula is a vital habitat for migrating birds etc. Roads, with their constant noise, and people in homes ( maybe with cats) threaten these habitats, which, as known to Dickens, were in their way isolated and desolate and which have become havens for wildlife away from people. Britain is a degraded habitat, especially England, and we need to protect those we have left.