5.22

Showing comments and forms 1 to 18 of 18

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 345

Received: 21/09/2023

Respondent: Mr Declan Kennedy

Representation Summary:

The Medway High Streets are filled with dated, small, and tight-fitted shops, including Gillingham, Iceland, Sports Direct, and Wilko's. These poorly designed establishments, with metal cladding on top levels, are crumbling and need to be demolished for high-density development and public spaces.

Most vacant units require demolition to accommodate modern developments.

Apartments above shops make the make sense, however they need to be accessible and modern, in which a major redesign of most Medway's High Streets and relocation of space needs to come in

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 382

Received: 02/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Nicholas Dowling

Representation Summary:

There are existing examples of good development within the Medway area that could serve as bench marks for new development

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 425

Received: 06/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Jill Norton

Representation Summary:

Agreed

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 714

Received: 26/10/2023

Respondent: Mx Onyx Rist

Representation Summary:

We need better public transport near all new developments and night time busses to be diverted to serve them.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 804

Received: 27/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Adam Taylor

Representation Summary:

Consider a metro system for Medway - link suburbs with transport hubs eg tram system. reduce need for cars in town centres. Make it easier to walk and cycle with a comprehensive cycle route systems which links together

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 873

Received: 28/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison

Representation Summary:

The Local Plan needs much more careful consideration.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1035

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Blueberry Homes

Agent: Savills

Representation Summary:

It is currently unclear what the boundaries of the ‘central urban areas’ are. As the Local Plan progresses, we request that these areas are identified and consulted on. However, we support the recognition that the underused and vacant sites have the potential for higher density development and our client fully intends to continue work collaboratively with the Council to establish an appropriate density for the Site.

References to ‘the Site’ mean Site Ref: GN6 (Gillingham No.3 and 4) identified in the Land Availability Assessment 2023 and as fully detailed in our letter of representations submitted to the Council.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1086

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Medway Green Party

Representation Summary:

This aspect of the Local Plan deserves much more consideration, as it could be a game changer in the regeneration of our town centres.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1131

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Medway Council Climate Response Team

Representation Summary:

New item for inclusion under Opportunities - Studies are under way to assess potential district heating opportunities within the central urban and urban waterfronts which could support the increasing energy demands of future growth.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1169

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: St John's College

Agent: Savills (UK) Ltd

Representation Summary:

There are two fundamental points associated with development on previously developed land, namely 1. the cost of remediation and 2. the typically urban environment justifying higher densities.
There does not appear to be any detailed evidence to support the assumption that the elderly/families may find accessibility to town centres desirable.
The role of brownfield sites is of course noted and an important focus for development. However, the role and benefits of greenfield sites should not be downplayed. A balanced approach not only helps meet a variety of needs that arise within the community but also helps facilitate a continuous delivery.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1257

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Sue Harwood

Representation Summary:

This makes sense as services and Infrastructure is already in place.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1305

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Helen Hopkins

Representation Summary:

I agree,

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1332

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Eutopia Homes

Representation Summary:

Whilst a plan-led approach is necessary in order to set the parameters for development, any emerging allocation should be flexible in terms of capacity and not preclude making the best use of vacant, brownfield sites. Such sites should be able to provide for a variety of unit types including flatted development (for those starting on the housing ladder and downsizers) rising up to larger scale family accommodation in order to address identified housing need.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1536

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Marilyn Stone

Representation Summary:

Fully support further consideration of the development of Urban areas

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1540

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cameron

Representation Summary:

The current bus service in inadequate and needs addressing. Frankly, I feel that for the money Arriva are receiving in subsidies form the Council, they should be providing a much better service.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1561

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Fred Skipsey

Representation Summary:

Excellent

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1576

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Alexander Cameron

Representation Summary:

Note that there are no good public transport links in Medway, most are poor and unreliable.

The central areas are fragmented and disconnected, with too much focus on places such as the historic dockyard for example which are not community centres.

Our plan should connect our centers together more organically in ways that discourage cars but encourage folks to walk and cycle. Sadly, the legacy of poor planning is very visible in many of our centers, so rebuilding the communities in them will need a more rounded approach with active engagement and participation.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1723

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin

Representation Summary:

Chatham Docks area / Chatham maritime does not have railway links and the buses are poor. There is also congestion and poor air quality