5.48

Comment

Representation ID: 630

Received: 25/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis

The Metropolitan greenbelt should be protected

Comment

Representation ID: 695

Received: 26/10/2023

Respondent: Ms Catriona Jamieson

Yes, please do not build on any Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 751

Received: 26/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Dan Dickinson

Yet again, you intend to create urban sprawl in areas like Capstone Valley and Rainham Riverside

Comment

Representation ID: 898

Received: 28/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison

I agree.

Comment

Representation ID: 942

Received: 29/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Kay Hutchfield

CHR3 and was the subject of a Planning Inquiry in March 2023.
The Planning Inquiry Inspector identified elements of the landscape and visual effects that are key issues that would prevent the site being considered for development and refused the appeal.
The National Planning Framework accords the highest status of protection to AONB and policy BNE32 of Medway Local Plan 2003 requires that any development should conserve the beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the area.
I believe this site is one of “those aspects of Medway that we want to safeguard for the future” .

Comment

Representation ID: 1143

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Medway Green Party

The Volume House Builders policy is to encourage the outward growth of London by stealth.

Comment

Representation ID: 1446

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Sheila Pinkstone

There was a planning application in March 2023 and the panning inspector stated that the effects on the area were key issues which would prevent the site being considered for development ANOB land has the highest protection and BNE32 the local plan2003 said that any development should protect the beauty, cultural heritage and wildlife. This site is one that we need to protect

Comment

Representation ID: 1613

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Alexander Cameron

The Green Belt is there for a purpose and no part of it must be released for development.