5.50

Showing comments and forms 1 to 10 of 10

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 541

Received: 20/10/2023

Respondent: Francesca Baylis

Representation Summary:

Completely agree with this statement. The greenbelt should be protected and other land should be used. Especially when Medway doesn't have much greenbelt to begin with.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 582

Received: 24/10/2023

Respondent: Mr John Baker

Representation Summary:

The protection of areas already designated as Green Belt is vital. Section 4 of the public consultation document indicates the Greenbelt Area and Greenbelt Sites. Section 5.50 reinforces the need to protect these areas from development
Part of one of the Greenbelt sites is in Bush Valley. This area was included as part of a Public Inquiry, relating to possible development,
which was held in Rochester in March this year . The Planning Inspectors decision, was that the proposed development should not be permitted. Much of the evidence related to the designations of Greenbelt and AONB which apply there

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 632

Received: 25/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis

Representation Summary:

Strongly agree with this statement

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 705

Received: 26/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Kevin Shipp

Representation Summary:

If this land is built on it would be a disgrace and against our environmental commitment to future generations.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 766

Received: 26/10/2023

Respondent: Miss Maria Lawrence

Representation Summary:

We should allocate more rural land to green belt protection to save wildlife

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 900

Received: 28/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison

Representation Summary:

Good.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 970

Received: 29/10/2023

Respondent: Mrs Alison Wells

Representation Summary:

Just because our green fields and areas are not Green Belt, they should still be defended from over-development.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1145

Received: 30/10/2023

Respondent: Medway Green Party

Representation Summary:

Some of the National Planning Policy Framework is better than others. This one actually makes good sense.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1615

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Alexander Cameron

Representation Summary:

The Green Belt is there for a purpose and no part of it must be released for development.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)

Representation ID: 1739

Received: 31/10/2023

Respondent: Mr Trevor East

Representation Summary:

Maintaining the greenbelt area is key. It is why many people choose to live in Medway and it is a valuable asset which could lend itself to more sustainable tourism options (but not processing plants ot informatuin sites for vineyards.
Encourage residents to learn more about their surroundings, the history or the local area and how we have lived symbiotically with the natural environment.