5.51
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 391
Received: 02/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Nicholas Dowling
Allocation any Land in the Green Belt in this area would be contrary to the Purpose of Green Belt and to the aspirations outlined in this document.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 404
Received: 03/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Stephen Dyke
Do not like the implication that Gravesham's focus on building on green belt land near Strood gives Medway Council an exclude to build on it too.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 537
Received: 20/10/2023
Respondent: Francesca Baylis
Completely agree that development should be in proximity to the transport networks and services in Strood. Development on Bush Road in Cuxton is far from the station on a road with no pavement and no way of putting pavement in which will only add to the danger of the a228 junction. There was previously section 106 money to improve this junction but nothing was done and the junction remains extremely dangerous.
LTC makes the greenbelt ever more important to mitigate the air quality and pollution impacts of the crossing and to protect Medway residents from the serious health impacts.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 584
Received: 24/10/2023
Respondent: Mr John Baker
Designations of Greenbelt and AONB should not be compromised in Medway, particularly Bush Valley, as a result of the potential actions of adjacent local authorities, to the detriment of Medway Residents
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 696
Received: 26/10/2023
Respondent: Ms Catriona Jamieson
No, please work with Gravesham Council to challenge this reduction in Green Belt. Lets not be dictated to by developers.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 901
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
This must not be allowed to occur.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 1146
Received: 30/10/2023
Respondent: Medway Green Party
Medway Council must not let developer greed cloud its vision.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 1389
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes
Agent: Iceni Projects
Despite currently being located within the Green Belt, the site specific Landscape, Visual and Green Belt Appraisal submitted with these Representations, clearly demonstrates that the site makes a limited contribution to the purpose and aims of the Green Belt. As such, the site is entirely suitable to accommodate new homes.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 1604
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mrs Marilyn Stone
Medway Council needs to hold firm and resist these development suggestions
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 1616
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Alexander Cameron
The Green Belt is there for a purpose and no part of it must be released for development.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 1658
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Matthew Nightingale
Gravesham planning development on their Green Belt should not constitute as a 'free for all' on Medway's adjoining Green Belt. The preservation and enhancement of this space needs to be critical for the future of the area. Cuxton and Halling face further destruction of their Green Belt, the North Downs and the usable agricultural land.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Representation ID: 1740
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Trevor East
There are plenty of sites that can be developed on without impacting on Medway's greenbelt. In fact, the fact we have access to the greenbelt should be our unique selling point rather than an option to build on.