Policy S23: Hempstead Valley District Centre

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 1974

Received: 12/08/2024

Respondent: Phillip Ivory

Representation Summary:

Rncoursage multi story parking and multiuse redev of the parking waste of space!

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2360

Received: 04/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Victoria Holloway

Representation Summary:

At lot can be learnt from how Hempstead Valley is used by local people and why the centre continues to be popular and well used. The provision of free and ample parking is certainly part of the appeal as well as the diversity of shops and services.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2537

Received: 05/09/2024

Respondent: Mr eric hall

Representation Summary:

The policy fails to provide a sufficient flexible and positive approach to Hempstead Valley. Please refer to full representations issued by email.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3151

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Anthony Rees

Representation Summary:

It's fine as is

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3308

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Yvonne Forrest

Representation Summary:

agree

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3990

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Wade

Representation Summary:

If the centres are to thrive then Hempstead Valley, like other out of town shopping outlets, should not be expanded. Hempstead Valley is rarely visited by people who do not live in the area. The upstairs community hall is no longer in use which could have been used for more community based activities. There has been a high turnover in tenants of Hempstead Valley over the years and recently charity shops are making inroads. There is nothing wrong in this but this is what happened in the town centres before they died.