Policy DM12: Local and Rural Centres
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Representation ID: 1848
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Mrs Stella Tiller
Admirals Walk and the Kestrel have long been neglected. The Kestrel is dirty and the anti-social behaviour makes this not a very nice place to be [REDACTED]. The provision of disabled parking near both of these areas is unsatisfactory, and not in the best position in Newton close. Disabled parking could be better located and better marked. The disabled parking at Admirals Walk is frequently occupied by non badge holders and people [REDACTED] in the barbers.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Representation ID: 2364
Received: 04/09/2024
Respondent: Mrs Victoria Holloway
The ability to walk to a range of shops and services from home is a very good thing both to the resident for their health and community connection and the surrounding areas because of the reduction in traffic congestion. Each new housing development, particularly those on greenfield sites do not have these added into their plans. A large development needs to cater for residents in more ways than just housing and play areas.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Representation ID: 3155
Received: 07/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Anthony Rees
These are all fine as they are
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Representation ID: 3193
Received: 07/09/2024
Respondent: Arches Chatham Neighbourhood Forum
The map of Local Centre 2-16, 28-46, 64-76 (evens) Luton Road, Chatham, does not appear to show 28-46 Luton Road. This should be amended.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Representation ID: 3279
Received: 07/09/2024
Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest
Improve local infrastructure first before development. People live in rural areas for a reason as they are not developed
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Representation ID: 3309
Received: 07/09/2024
Respondent: Mrs Yvonne Forrest
agree
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Representation ID: 3606
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr John Williams
Rural centres must always be in the equation when enhancements and growth plans and services are considered for Medway.
In the past rural areas have lacked the right investment and missed out on village enhancements.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Representation ID: 3887
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Miss Rachael Selleck
I live in Allhallows and agree that our infrastructure is inadequate. It’s perplexing that more houses are being proposed here despite your own admission that our current infrastructure cannot support additional development and is not sustainable. What we need is investment in infrastructure, not more housing. If the Council truly cares about our community, it should prioritise improving our existing facilities rather than overburdening us with new developments. Supporting our infrastructure needs will better serve the community and ensure that future growth is manageable and beneficial.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Representation ID: 4062
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Robert Wyatt
Agreed