Object

Representation ID: 4794

Received: 10/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alison Heine

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Without evidence it can not be concluded that much need can be met through expansion and intensification

Object

Representation ID: 4832

Received: 10/08/2025

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Mulloy

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The policy proposes intensification of the Cuxton public site without providing sufficient long term:

Environmental capacity assessment (impact on landscape, flood risk, access);

Assessment of site suitability for higher density occupation under environmental health and amenity standards;

Consultation with affected communities, both resident and adjacent.

Criteria for New Sites – Lack of Specificity

Policy T10 currently lacks the legal and evidential foundation required to be considered sound. The updated GTAA is essential — not optional — to justify its policy direction and site decisions

Object

Representation ID: 5012

Received: 11/08/2025

Respondent: Mr satinder Shokar

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The local plan doesn't allocated any of the required sites for GRT community. It has not taken the recommendations of the GTAA on board. The plan assumes that some of that need can be met through expansion of existing sites, which will lead to over intensification of these sites, leading to overcrowding. It has failed identify any new land suitable for local site provision. It has failed to also conduct any assessment of the GRT families living in bricks and mortar looking for pitches. It has thus not treated this community fairly in meeting their need.