Showing comments and forms 1 to 16 of 16

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2407

Received: 04/09/2024

Respondent: Mr John Conner

Representation Summary:

Essential that there is a market need and it is not simply for the benefit of the business owner whilst it must not impact adversely on similar operations ie it must add to the local economy and does not adversely effect the environment or Green Spaces or National landscapes.

Full text:

Essential that there is a market need and it is not simply for the benefit of the business owner whilst it must not impact adversely on similar operations ie it must add to the local economy and does not adversely effect the environment or Green Spaces or National landscapes.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2907

Received: 06/09/2024

Respondent: Mr John Collins DHA Planning

Agent: Mr Joseph Heraghty

Representation Summary:

In respect of Policy T13, we are mindful that St Andrews Lakes has become a very successful leisure and tourism destination. Our one concern is that the Green Belt designation may result in what is a fantastic potential resource being underutilised to the detriment of Medway residents. We would ask the Council to consider whether in view of the fact that the site now very much relates to the built up area of Halling, and in view of the enormous leisure potential that the the site has, it ought to be removed from the Green Belt.

Full text:

In respect of Policy T13, we are mindful that St Andrews Lakes has become a very successful leisure and tourism destination. Our one concern is that the Green Belt designation may result in what is a fantastic potential resource being underutilised to the detriment of Medway residents. We would ask the Council to consider whether in view of the fact that the site now very much relates to the built up area of Halling, and in view of the enormous leisure potential that the the site has, it ought to be removed from the Green Belt.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3021

Received: 06/09/2024

Respondent: Mr robert fynn

Representation Summary:

Agree

Full text:

Agree

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3131

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Anthony Rees

Representation Summary:

This section is giving me a headache to read, it's all elongated and in jargon I don't understand. Are you talking about hotels etc?

Full text:

This section is giving me a headache to read, it's all elongated and in jargon I don't understand. Are you talking about hotels etc?

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3194

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Roger Brown

Representation Summary:

Medway Council should have been far more supportive of the concept of a Hoo Peninsula National Park (the green lung of Medway)

Full text:

Medway Council should have been far more supportive of the concept of a Hoo Peninsula National Park (the green lung of Medway)

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3245

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Lynn Davis

Representation Summary:

Nowhere in this document has Haven Kent Coast been mentioned as a site of holiday accommodation and a visitor destination. This site attracts an enormous turnover of holidaymakers in addition to people who own caravans and spend all their holidays there. This site has permission for 1400 caravan pitches and has yet to reach that total. There has also been no mention of how it affects village resources e.g. water, sewage and electricity

Full text:

Nowhere in this document has Haven Kent Coast been mentioned as a site of holiday accommodation and a visitor destination. This site attracts an enormous turnover of holidaymakers in addition to people who own caravans and spend all their holidays there. This site has permission for 1400 caravan pitches and has yet to reach that total. There has also been no mention of how it affects village resources e.g. water, sewage and electricity

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3263

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Representation Summary:

Why then did the council close down the Rochester tourism office

Full text:

Why then did the council close down the Rochester tourism office

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3288

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Yvonne Forrest

Representation Summary:

if you support tourism why did you close the information centre in rochester high street

Full text:

if you support tourism why did you close the information centre in rochester high street

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3522

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Frances Grigg

Representation Summary:

I support this policy. However, I would like the following to be added to the penultimate bullet point: ', especially in Internationally and Nationally protected sites, including National Landscape sites.'

Full text:

I support this policy. However, I would like the following to be added to the penultimate bullet point: ', especially in Internationally and Nationally protected sites, including National Landscape sites.'

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3569

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mr John Williams

Representation Summary:

With the rich historical heritage that Medway has we must do everything to promote door Diverse Medway.
I think the closing of the tourist information office in Rochester was a big mistake considering the value of the the
Tourist trade in Rochester and rest of Medway.

Full text:

With the rich historical heritage that Medway has we must do everything to promote door Diverse Medway.
I think the closing of the tourist information office in Rochester was a big mistake considering the value of the the
Tourist trade in Rochester and rest of Medway.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3712

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Ian Proctor

Representation Summary:

Add to the penultimate bullet point, after open countryside "and especially those sited in internationally and nationally protected sites, including National Landscape sites".

Full text:

Add to the penultimate bullet point, after open countryside "and especially those sited in internationally and nationally protected sites, including National Landscape sites".

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3766

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Bryan Fowler

Representation Summary:

There is a need for more and better quality hotel accommodation in town centres especially Rochester. A quality assurance unit should be established.

Full text:

There is a need for more and better quality hotel accommodation in town centres especially Rochester. A quality assurance unit should be established.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3835

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Brian McDonald

Representation Summary:

Recognise and support the fabric of the natural assets across land and estuarine areas to promote the area for sustainable tourism. Tranquillity, dark skies and rural isolation are valuable assets that can attract and increase visitors seeking sustainable tourism. Good food, walking, cycling and water based activity should factor in this and be encouraged in the local plan. Prevent and avoid negative impacts from inappropriate development in protected areas.

Full text:

Recognise and support the fabric of the natural assets across land and estuarine areas to promote the area for sustainable tourism. Tranquillity, dark skies and rural isolation are valuable assets that can attract and increase visitors seeking sustainable tourism. Good food, walking, cycling and water based activity should factor in this and be encouraged in the local plan. Prevent and avoid negative impacts from inappropriate development in protected areas.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3865

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Miss Rachael Selleck

Representation Summary:

The council needs to focus on promoting tourism that genuinely benefits the local area. In Allhallows, the Haven Holiday Park has brought chaos rather than positive impacts. Despite ongoing issues like crime—ranging from money laundering to violent incidents—and a significant rise in car accidents involving park visitors, the park continues to expand unchecked. The increase in antisocial behaviour and traffic problems has made the village less safe. It’s essential that tourism development enhances local well-being and safety, rather than exacerbating existing issues.

Full text:

The council needs to focus on promoting tourism that genuinely benefits the local area. In Allhallows, the Haven Holiday Park has brought chaos rather than positive impacts. Despite ongoing issues like crime—ranging from money laundering to violent incidents—and a significant rise in car accidents involving park visitors, the park continues to expand unchecked. The increase in antisocial behaviour and traffic problems has made the village less safe. It’s essential that tourism development enhances local well-being and safety, rather than exacerbating existing issues.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3927

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Wade

Representation Summary:

I would like to see promotion of our tourist sites all year around rather than seasonal. The closure of the Rochester information centre is a waste since the building is in use anyway for the Hugenot Museum, surely this could be used to better promote the Towns. There is not much to offer for the tourist browsing the Towns; Rochester high street is full of charity shops and cafes; Chatham has poundshops and mobile phone outlets and Gillingham is in a similar situation. A better provision to encourage browsing is needed. Look at tourist town centres.

Full text:

I would like to see promotion of our tourist sites all year around rather than seasonal. The closure of the Rochester information centre is a waste since the building is in use anyway for the Hugenot Museum, surely this could be used to better promote the Towns. There is not much to offer for the tourist browsing the Towns; Rochester high street is full of charity shops and cafes; Chatham has poundshops and mobile phone outlets and Gillingham is in a similar situation. A better provision to encourage browsing is needed. Look at tourist town centres.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 4145

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Alison Gray

Representation Summary:

It is really important that rural tourism reflects the sensitivity of the natural environment to safeguard its special features.
It is vital to retain areas of countryside that are not tourist areas, have not been urbanised, or manicured; that one can experience areas of countryside without having to pay for the experience.

Full text:

It is really important that rural tourism reflects the sensitivity of the natural environment to safeguard its special features.
It is vital to retain areas of countryside that are not tourist areas, have not been urbanised, or manicured; that one can experience areas of countryside without having to pay for the experience.