Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Search form responses
Results for Miss Sarah Tyler search
New searchThis needs to be in line of the current needs of the area and these could include more requirements of developers to introduce community focused services/buildings as part of their plans above and beyond that of requirements and S106 funding.
Yes, the amount of land being repurposed for housing significantly reduces the biodiversity of the area where the new properties are located.
The increase of biodiversity will also support the farming by having more wild meadows leading to more bees and butterflies in turn improving crop yield and therefore economic growth.
Yes as long as this is enforced and is not something developers can find a loop hole such as supplying S106 funding etc.
Yes, there are other elements of the local area which are important to residents over the development of more housing.
Areas of local heritage, such as the hop farming industry, the dock working era and other areas which may not be identified in the current plan. Areas where residents visit frequently and serve multiple purposes, for example Rochester.
Yes
From what can be seen on the map - yes
Yes, the information we use must be following all recommendations from current assessments
It would be beneficial to ensure we review this if there are other recommendations which we have not considered or accounted from in the current proposed plan.
Yes this should.
No answer given
No, this needs to be more balanced with the affordable housing and housing for purchase at higher prices.
No this needs to be higher.
Urban brownfield sites should have 30% and greenfield or high value sites should have 50% affordable house, ensuring local houses for local people, reducing the available of large numbers moving from inner London to Medway.
Leasehold properties should be excluded as this is additional charges on household for services which are usually covered in the council tax bills. Housing association properties should constitute 60% of the affording housing with the rest being made up of part buy part rent accommodation.
Leasehold properties should be excluded from any developments as they often charge high ground rent and service charges for things covered by council tax. The split should be 60% for housing associations and the rest for low cost part buy part rent properties.
Having more than 5 within an area of 3 mile radius from others
No
Yes
Yes fully, these need to be conducted to ensure there are limited to no negative impact on the area and residents.
Yes
No as this takes out a portion of shops which would still be classed as part of Chatham.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
The masterplan boundary is suitable
Yes
Masterplan
Yes
Yes as there are limited facilities on the Isle.
Yes
Not at this time
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No answer given
Yes there is significant lack of parking around the local areas especially the business estates.
A new hospital
More community led programmes within healthy living centres. Higher occupancy of centers like this.
Mental health services
Provide more internship opportunities in partnership with charities and the government to get these individuals into work.
Nothing of note to me
This needs to focus on communities, identify need then review and design infrastructure.
This would be better as each area would have a deep dive.
This needs to be considered in a versatile way ensuring that there are only developments where there is a significant gap to ensure funding is spent appropriately.
Yes however it would better if the waste was not in Medway to start with.
