Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Search form responses

Results for Miss Rosamund Beattie search

New search New search
Form ID: 4093
Respondent: Miss Rosamund Beattie

You haven't provided any sample ideas of what you are considering so it is difficult to comment.

Perhaps. To what level? What would that likely entail? Hopefully not a green roof.

No answer given

Just don't build near these areas. The tariff system is just a buyoff like ULEZ. For example, paying £25 to drive through London doesn't make the air any cleaner. In the same way, getting developers to contribute money to schemes to allegedly compensate for the damage to the existing sites does not actually mitigate the original loss and damage and certainly for migratory birds this can be very detrimental.

Yes

Whether it is a historic landscape, well known and loved by generations. Whether it is part of the identity of a place, such as how Rochester Castle defines Rochester and is and instantly recognisable landscape. And if it is a structure of signficant historical or archeological value.

Yes

I am not sure at this stage, there is more reading around the subject to complete.

Only where enforcing green belt protections and environmental and heritage considerations are maintained or improved.

Not if these exceptional circumstances require housing to be built there.

Form ID: 4134
Respondent: Miss Rosamund Beattie

Why not? Why have ugly signage? Some streets are quite pretty despite not being designated conservation areas. It is probably too late for Chatham High Street.

No answer given

Please read the help guide if you are using this consultation platform for the first time.