Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Search representations
Results for Mr Graham Crawford search
New searchComment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Vision for Medway in 2041
Representation ID: 3484
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Graham Crawford
If the river is so important why are you trying to close Chatham docks where there are high quality jobs as you outline as necessary in your plan . Surely not more houses WHERE'S are the HOSPITALS DOCTORS TEACHERS to service the rising population from the other areas. The NHS is falling to bits as it is. Medway maritime hospital cannot cope it has to serve a population of 500 000 as it . What you are suggesting is ludicrous. One more factor is the development planned by Maidstone borough Council just over the border which hospital is nearest .
If the river is so important why are you trying to close Chatham docks where there are high quality jobs as you outline as necessary in your plan . Surely not more houses WHERE'S are the HOSPITALS DOCTORS TEACHERS to service the rising population from the other areas. The NHS is falling to bits as it is. Medway maritime hospital cannot cope it has to serve a population of 500 000 as it . What you are suggesting is ludicrous. One more factor is the development planned by Maidstone borough Council just over the border which hospital is nearest .
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Supporting people to lead healthy lives and strengthening our communities
Representation ID: 3510
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Graham Crawford
MORE WAFFLE if you are serious then developers must provide social housing in spades. How are you going to persuade the elderly to down size if they own the property are you going to send in the jack boots in? As for the public realm the existing country parks are too far for many to walk to and you have just instituted car parking fees.As for the rest another load of WAFFLE 🧇
MORE WAFFLE if you are serious then developers must provide social housing in spades. How are you going to persuade the elderly to down size if they own the property are you going to send in the jack boots in? As for the public realm the existing country parks are too far for many to walk to and you have just instituted car parking fees.As for the rest another load of WAFFLE 🧇
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Securing jobs and developing skills for a competitive economy
Representation ID: 3533
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Graham Crawford
Securing jobs don't make me laugh Chatham docks are threatened with closure where there are good jobs going.The council can't deliver high speed broadband only private companies can : again are you going to dragoon these into building broadband networks.
From what I understand the universities are losing students as it is proving too expensive for the result. As for tourism it's only Rochester that is a main attraction and the historic Dockyard plus Rochester castleand cathedral. Can't think of any more. P
Securing jobs don't make me laugh Chatham docks are threatened with closure where there are good jobs going.The council can't deliver high speed broadband only private companies can : again are you going to dragoon these into building broadband networks.
From what I understand the universities are losing students as it is proving too expensive for the result. As for tourism it's only Rochester that is a main attraction and the historic Dockyard plus Rochester castleand cathedral. Can't think of any more. P
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Prepared for a sustainable and green future
Representation ID: 3536
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Graham Crawford
How in God's name can you improve on walking when most of the greener areas have no more than narrow country lanes?
Further to that how are you going to improve & develop transport networks run a new bus company?How on earth are you going to protect the natural environment assets when you are going to concrete over it all? What you propose is a load of old waffle 🧇.
How in God's name can you improve on walking when most of the greener areas have no more than narrow country lanes?
Further to that how are you going to improve & develop transport networks run a new bus company?How on earth are you going to protect the natural environment assets when you are going to concrete over it all? What you propose is a load of old waffle 🧇.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Supporting people to lead healthy lives and strengthening our communities
Representation ID: 3560
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Graham Crawford
Surely the main thrust is to build social housing As for mentioning Travellers not so long ago a group of travellers were evicted from their site on Lower Rainham road for contravening planning regs. Most of the population of medway need to travel by car to use the country parks on top of that you have instituted car parking fees on the country parks that's a deterrent to start with. As for elderly down sizing if they own the property how can you move them dragoon them?
Surely the main thrust is to build social housing As for mentioning Travellers not so long ago a group of travellers were evicted from their site on Lower Rainham road for contravening planning regs. Most of the population of medway need to travel by car to use the country parks on top of that you have instituted car parking fees on the country parks that's a deterrent to start with. As for elderly down sizing if they own the property how can you move them dragoon them?
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Spatial Development Strategy
Representation ID: 3583
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Graham Crawford
Well pretty soon there won't be Kent downs it will be a sprawl of houses right up to the downs. Another load of waffle What the hell is Chatham intra? On all the planning applications there will be unacceptable impacts on infrastructure and environments.
Well pretty soon there won't be Kent downs it will be a sprawl of houses right up to the downs. Another load of waffle What the hell is Chatham intra? On all the planning applications there will be unacceptable impacts on infrastructure and environments.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
3.2.1
Representation ID: 3594
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Graham Crawford
SGO 2 is the best way forward as it leaves Chatham docks in place.
SGO 2 is the best way forward as it leaves Chatham docks in place.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy S1: Planning for Climate Change
Representation ID: 3600
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Graham Crawford
Afraid most of the aims laudable as they are will not be realised particularly for walking and cycling most of the rural roads are little more than cart tracks.Just how are you going to manage water resources what efficiency measures rationing people to a couple of buckets a day don't talk wet(no pun intended).
Afraid most of the aims laudable as they are will not be realised particularly for walking and cycling most of the rural roads are little more than cart tracks.Just how are you going to manage water resources what efficiency measures rationing people to a couple of buckets a day don't talk wet(no pun intended).
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy S2: Conservation and Enhancement of the Natural Environment
Representation ID: 3607
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Graham Crawford
If there's money to be made by developers this will all be forgotten or weakened.
If there's money to be made by developers this will all be forgotten or weakened.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy S3: North Kent Estuary and Marshes designated sites
Representation ID: 3613
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Graham Crawford
Should be 12km and absolutely nothing closer its everyone's heritage.
Should be 12km and absolutely nothing closer its everyone's heritage.
