Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Search representations
Results for Shaun Delaney search
New searchComment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy T21: Riverside Infrastructure
Representation ID: 3891
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Shaun Delaney
I think this is important, as once lost, these sites will be difficult to replicate. I hope this safeguarding will include the facilities at Chatham Docks given their locks differentiate them from other shipping infrastructure.
I think this is important, as once lost, these sites will be difficult to replicate. I hope this safeguarding will include the facilities at Chatham Docks given their locks differentiate them from other shipping infrastructure.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
3.2.1
Representation ID: 3893
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Shaun Delaney
The use of truly brownfield sites that are closed or derelict is positive. It's a shame that functioning business areas like Chatham Docks are categorised as brownfield. It is regrettable that we cannot have an SGO 3 that safeguards the maritime nature of the businesses at Chatham Docks.
The use of truly brownfield sites that are closed or derelict is positive. It's a shame that functioning business areas like Chatham Docks are categorised as brownfield. It is regrettable that we cannot have an SGO 3 that safeguards the maritime nature of the businesses at Chatham Docks.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy T21: Riverside Infrastructure
Representation ID: 3894
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Shaun Delaney
I think this is important, as once lost, these sites will be difficult to replicate. I hope this safeguarding will include the facilities at Chatham Docks given their locks differentiate them from other shipping infrastructure.
I think this is important, as once lost, these sites will be difficult to replicate. I hope this safeguarding will include the facilities at Chatham Docks given their locks differentiate them from other shipping infrastructure.
