Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 32

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 1810

Received: 17/07/2024

Respondent: Mr Keith Clear

Representation Summary:

There are large areas of concrete landscapes in Medway and just because we need housing doesn’t mean we have to restrict green areas. There are many examples across the country where urban development has allowed green spaces. There could be vertical ones too. There are instances of birds of prey making their homes on tall office buildings. The use of green roofs or green walls could encourage more biodiversity into our town centres especially if we reduce motor traffic into more sustainable methods.

Full text:

There are large areas of concrete landscapes in Medway and just because we need housing doesn’t mean we have to restrict green areas. There are many examples across the country where urban development has allowed green spaces. There could be vertical ones too. There are instances of birds of prey making their homes on tall office buildings. The use of green roofs or green walls could encourage more biodiversity into our town centres especially if we reduce motor traffic into more sustainable methods.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 1827

Received: 18/07/2024

Respondent: Ms Wendy Taylor

Representation Summary:

To preserve these valuable areas you are going to need some sort of wardens. We deal with the litter, antisocial teen behaviour and fires here ourselves at present. None of us are getting any younger! More people means greater negative impact on the area.
Have you noticed how [REDACTED] Medway looks in many areas?

Full text:

To preserve these valuable areas you are going to need some sort of wardens. We deal with the litter, antisocial teen behaviour and fires here ourselves at present. None of us are getting any younger! More people means greater negative impact on the area.
Have you noticed how filthy Medway looks in many areas?

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2011

Received: 15/08/2024

Respondent: Mr Leslie Brown

Representation Summary:

The south coast of England has many wonderful developments, hence restricting them in Medway may be counterproductive.
St Mary's Island is one example of quality, albeit private maintenance.

Full text:

The south coast of England has many wonderful developments, hence restricting them in Medway may be counterproductive.
St Mary's Island is one example of quality, albeit private maintenance.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2335

Received: 04/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Victoria Holloway

Representation Summary:

Farm land is being too easily thought of as suitable land for housing. Once made for housing it will never go back. More farm land needs to be kept to prevent further urban spread and encourage wildlife to stay or even return. These areas are better used to be turned into wildlife areas which is also better for the human spirit. Some farmland will inherently be needed for housing but habitats and corridors are being lost.

Full text:

Farm land is being too easily thought of as suitable land for housing. Once made for housing it will never go back. More farm land needs to be kept to prevent further urban spread and encourage wildlife to stay or even return. These areas are better used to be turned into wildlife areas which is also better for the human spirit. Some farmland will inherently be needed for housing but habitats and corridors are being lost.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2357

Received: 04/09/2024

Respondent: Mr John Conner

Representation Summary:

Totally agree

Full text:

Totally agree

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2428

Received: 04/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Sergio Nogues

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2483

Received: 04/09/2024

Respondent: Medway Labour and Cooperative Group

Representation Summary:

Affirm

Full text:

Affirm

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2507

Received: 05/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Jon Emery

Representation Summary:

Support this policy.

Full text:

Support this policy.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2524

Received: 05/09/2024

Respondent: Mr John Rodney Smyth

Representation Summary:

Unclear whether the North Kent marshes SLA designation is still in force.

In any event, the NK marshes should be given at least as strong protection under the updated Medway LCA.

Their landscape is uniquely attractive - and, for example, renewable energy development (e.g., a wind farm) would ruin it.

Full text:

Unclear whether the North Kent marshes SLA designation is still in force.

In any event, the NK marshes should be given at least as strong protection under the updated Medway LCA.

Their landscape is uniquely attractive - and, for example, renewable energy development (e.g., a wind farm) would ruin it.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2591

Received: 05/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Jason Tillman

Representation Summary:

Capstone Oaks and the 800+ homes at Capstone Farm will completely cover the green corridor between Lordswood and Hempstead.

Full text:

Capstone Oaks and the 800+ homes at Capstone Farm will completely cover the green corridor between Lordswood and Hempstead.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2615

Received: 05/09/2024

Respondent: BERENGRAVE LANE 2 LTD

Agent: Iceni Projects

Representation Summary:

The LCA is currently fundamentally flawed in its assessment of LCA1 and does not consider recent developments that have successfully been developed in areas of low landscape importance and function. Any future LCA must be appreciative of the pressures placed on character areas, and seek to protect the most important, in terms of landscape quality and function, but acknowledge that sustainable development on areas of limited landscape importance can be supported.

Full text:

The existing and emerging development pattern should be revisited and included within the final LCA E1. The landscape qualities of the LCA E1 (and all LCA areas) must include acknowledgement that there are areas, such as this Site at RN17, that at the edges of the LCA boundary, and / or which have no landscape or functional importance. That the primary focus of the Development Management Guidance is clarified to ensure that inappropriate development, i.e. schemes that materially harm the function and character of areas of the most important, in terms of landscape quality and function, are resisted, but that sustainable development in areas of limited landscape quality is supported. The principle of the LCA must acknowledge the significant housing pressures that the Council is under, and that some sites can forward for residential development. Without this appreciation in the LCA, or any subsequent Policy that refers to the final version of the LCA, the application of the document as drafted could substantially inhibit the Council in delivering the required housing.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2676

Received: 06/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Louise Putnam

Representation Summary:

In the support Policy S4 but there's conflict here with your proposed housing sites. Particularly in Hoo, an area the plan identifies for more housing opportunities. The increased urbanisation and sprawl of Hoo must be avoided as it has a negative impact on wildlife and the character of the landscape. Similarly, in Allhallows the proposed housing sites will adversely impact the rural landscape character, increase disturbance to wildlife, and lead to a loss in biodiversity.

Full text:

In the support Policy S4 but there's conflict here with your proposed housing sites. Particularly in Hoo, an area the plan identifies for more housing opportunities. The increased urbanisation and sprawl of Hoo must be avoided as it has a negative impact on wildlife and the character of the landscape. Similarly, in Allhallows the proposed housing sites will adversely impact the rural landscape character, increase disturbance to wildlife, and lead to a loss in biodiversity.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2780

Received: 06/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Anthony Rees

Representation Summary:

If you care so much about the valleys in Medway, why on earth are you allowing Attwood to build on the whole of Capstone Valley? That makes no sense at all

Full text:

If you care so much about the valleys in Medway, why on earth are you allowing Attwood to build on the whole of Capstone Valley? That makes no sense at all

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 2949

Received: 06/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Paul Pattison

Representation Summary:

I support this policy but it needs teeth. Areas of Medway with outstanding landscape character are being eroded through inappropriate use e.g. a) small rural lanes being used routinely by HGV traffic, leading to erosion of verges and hedge banks b) persistent fly-tipping. More active interventions are therefore required.

Full text:

I support this policy but it needs teeth. Areas of Medway with outstanding landscape character are being eroded through inappropriate use e.g. a) small rural lanes being used routinely by HGV traffic, leading to erosion of verges and hedge banks b) persistent fly-tipping. More active interventions are therefore required.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3099

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Matthew Wells

Representation Summary:

We fully support the council's aim to conserve and enhance Medway's character and local distinctiveness, particularly with reference to the North Downs area. Greater restrictions should be placed on using anything other than vernacular building materials. Features of historic landscapes must be preserved, as must the darkness and tranquillity of the very few dark sky areas within Medway.

Full text:

We fully support the council's aim to conserve and enhance Medway's character and local distinctiveness, particularly with reference to the North Downs area. Greater restrictions should be placed on using anything other than vernacular building materials. Features of historic landscapes must be preserved, as must the darkness and tranquillity of the very few dark sky areas within Medway.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3125

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Roger Brown

Representation Summary:

Sadly, DEFRA, Natural England and Medway LPA and the planning Inspectorate have failed to protect natural England. For some reason The Secretaries of State for Housing always seem to cancel out good science and Local Authorities do not have the resources to raise a legal challenge. The damage started by Right to Buy continues apace.

Full text:

Sadly, DEFRA, Natural England and Medway LPA and the planning Inspectorate have failed to protect natural England. For some reason The Secretaries of State for Housing always seem to cancel out good science and Local Authorities do not have the resources to raise a legal challenge. The damage started by Right to Buy continues apace.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3192

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Representation Summary:

If the council wants to conserve the beauty of the countryside dont develop it and build homes and the rural areas cant support and ruin the environment.

Full text:

If the council wants to conserve the beauty of the countryside dont develop it and build homes and the rural areas cant support and ruin the environment.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3208

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Yvonne Forrest

Representation Summary:

when you have finished building on the Hoo peninsula there will be no distinctiveness

Full text:

when you have finished building on the Hoo peninsula there will be no distinctiveness

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3366

Received: 07/09/2024

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Representation Summary:

The way to conserve is not to build or development these areas

Full text:

The way to conserve is not to build or development these areas

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3440

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Frances Grigg

Representation Summary:

I strongly support this policy, in particular the emphasis on KDNL, and also that development is directed towards areas of lower landscape sensitivity.

Full text:

I strongly support this policy, in particular the emphasis on KDNL, and also that development is directed towards areas of lower landscape sensitivity.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3557

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Andrew Lawrence

Representation Summary:

Agree with this policy.

Full text:

Agree with this policy.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3562

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Sue Harwood

Representation Summary:

If Capstone Valley 'brings an accessible rural landscape into the heart of Gillingham and Chatham' then how can you justify building over all of the Capstone Valley, except for the Country Park. This will no longer be a rural landscape.

Full text:

If Capstone Valley 'brings an accessible rural landscape into the heart of Gillingham and Chatham' then how can you justify building over all of the Capstone Valley, except for the Country Park. This will no longer be a rural landscape.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3570

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Miss Alison Temple

Representation Summary:

Again, the plan serves to organize these areas to suit the bigger proposals rather than encourage and enhance their natural development. This is a token gesture and does not serve the interest of the public or natural spaces.
The best plan would be to be sympathetic to nature and leave these areas to nature however I believe many know that the background agenda is self serving for developers and local government for financial gain and profit.

Full text:

Again, the plan serves to organize these areas to suit the bigger proposals rather than encourage and enhance their natural development. This is a token gesture and does not serve the interest of the public or natural spaces.
The best plan would be to be sympathetic to nature and leave these areas to nature however I believe many know that the background agenda is self serving for developers and local government for financial gain and profit.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3665

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Miss Rachael Selleck

Representation Summary:

Medway's landscape is under significant pressure from urbanisation, development, and climate change, which threaten its distinctiveness and biodiversity. The Council recognises these issues, highlighting the negative impacts of development, including habitat fragmentation and loss of inter-tidal areas. However, the planned development in Allhallows contradicts this recognition. Building in this area will exacerbate these issues by contributing to habitat loss, increased urban pressures, and further fragmentation of the landscape. If the Council truly values landscape distinctiveness and aims to mitigate climate change effects, their actions should reflect these priorities. Instead, the current plans undermine the very principles they claim to uphold.

Full text:

Medway's landscape is under significant pressure from urbanisation, development, and climate change, which threaten its distinctiveness and biodiversity. The Council recognises these issues, highlighting the negative impacts of development, including habitat fragmentation and loss of inter-tidal areas. However, the planned development in Allhallows contradicts this recognition. Building in this area will exacerbate these issues by contributing to habitat loss, increased urban pressures, and further fragmentation of the landscape. If the Council truly values landscape distinctiveness and aims to mitigate climate change effects, their actions should reflect these priorities. Instead, the current plans undermine the very principles they claim to uphold.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3675

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Ian Proctor

Representation Summary:

I support this policy.

Full text:

I support this policy.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3703

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Abbey Developments Ltd.

Agent: Mr Les West

Representation Summary:

Abbey Developments supports the Council's proposed review of the landscape character assessment which is intended to identify those areas of lower landscape importance for development. Abbey Developments considers that the site at ME8 8QT, to the east of Rainham along Meresborough Road to the south-east of Moor Park Close, is an area which should be removed from the Area of Local Landscape Importance currently identified in policy BNE34. It notes that the Council is supporting a strategy of suburban expansion of Rainham in this vicinity by identifying preferred sites RSE9 and 10 of the draft Proposals Map.

Full text:

Abbey Developments supports the Council's proposed review of the landscape character assessment which is intended to identify those areas of lower landscape importance for development. Abbey Developments considers that the site at ME8 8QT, to the east of Rainham along Meresborough Road to the south-east of Moor Park Close, is an area which should be removed from the Area of Local Landscape Importance currently identified in policy BNE34. It notes that the Council is supporting a strategy of suburban expansion of Rainham in this vicinity by identifying preferred sites RSE9 and 10 of the draft Proposals Map.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3768

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin

Representation Summary:

we should be protecting the grade one agricultural land for the security of our future food supplies.

Full text:

we should be protecting the grade one agricultural land for the security of our future food supplies.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3818

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Alison Gray

Representation Summary:

I value all the Council's efforts to use landscape to contain urban sprawl and prevent the joining up of settlements, and to maintain the distinctiveness of the widely differing landscapes. I am strongly in favour of keeping undeveloped coast undeveloped. I look forward to updated LCAs.
It would definitely be beneficial if new development restored lost landscape distinctiveness, particularly to balance some of the previous uniformly uninspired estate developments.
Excellent that 'undeveloped' is a valued characteristic.

Full text:

I value all the Council's efforts to use landscape to contain urban sprawl and prevent the joining up of settlements, and to maintain the distinctiveness of the widely differing landscapes. I am strongly in favour of keeping undeveloped coast undeveloped. I look forward to updated LCAs.
It would definitely be beneficial if new development restored lost landscape distinctiveness, particularly to balance some of the previous uniformly uninspired estate developments.
Excellent that 'undeveloped' is a valued characteristic.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3879

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mrs Hilary Savage

Representation Summary:

I strongly agree that Medway’s policies must reflect the importance of ALL the wonderful areas of Medway’s Natural Landscape Areas. especially around the rural villages and communities. People need, and will continue to need, the diversity that the natural countryside has to offer.

Full text:

I strongly agree that Medway’s policies must reflect the importance of ALL the wonderful areas of Medway’s Natural Landscape Areas. especially around the rural villages and communities. People need, and will continue to need, the diversity that the natural countryside has to offer.

Comment

Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Representation ID: 3971

Received: 08/09/2024

Respondent: Mr Robert Wyatt

Representation Summary:

Fully agree

Full text:

Fully agree