Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Search representations
Results for Mr Kevin Shipp search
New searchComment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
The plan's vision is to
Representation ID: 700
Received: 26/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Kevin Shipp
This section talks about how we are a economic player in the area, this is not in line with the fact that the Chatham Docks are one of the areas for future development. The businesses within Chatham Docks currently turn over around 250million pounds a year and if this is shut this income will be lost and jobs will be lost. It is essential that we have jobs available for our residents and by taking away commercial businesses this is not in line with this statement.
This section talks about how we are a economic player in the area, this is not in line with the fact that the Chatham Docks are one of the areas for future development. The businesses within Chatham Docks currently turn over around 250million pounds a year and if this is shut this income will be lost and jobs will be lost. It is essential that we have jobs available for our residents and by taking away commercial businesses this is not in line with this statement.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Securing jobs and developing skills for a competitive economy
Representation ID: 701
Received: 26/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Kevin Shipp
By shutting the Chatham docks, which is currently classified as commercial space, this would not foster local jobs this would remove jobs and also remove 250million of local turnover which is a big boost to the local economy. Shutting the docks would be in direct conflict with with building on engineering and energy industries in the area, which the dock is involved in. Shutting the docks would not develop jobs of the future it would remove them along with the infrastructure. To help create future spaces ArcelorMittal have proposed they could buy the dock and invest in its future.
By shutting the Chatham docks, which is currently classified as commercial space, this would not foster local jobs this would remove jobs and also remove 250million of local turnover which is a big boost to the local economy. Shutting the docks would be in direct conflict with with building on engineering and energy industries in the area, which the dock is involved in. Shutting the docks would not develop jobs of the future it would remove them along with the infrastructure. To help create future spaces ArcelorMittal have proposed they could buy the dock and invest in its future.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.1
Representation ID: 702
Received: 26/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Kevin Shipp
It is essential that the council does not change the land use designation of Chatham docks, in line with previous plans to ensure the businesses within Chatham docks can stay and the area can benefit from jobs and the local turnover of 250million pounds.
It is essential that the council does not change the land use designation of Chatham docks, in line with previous plans to ensure the businesses within Chatham docks can stay and the area can benefit from jobs and the local turnover of 250million pounds.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.21
Representation ID: 703
Received: 26/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Kevin Shipp
This is not in line with local jobs, the businesses turn over 250million pounds in the Chatham docks and this will benefit only the shareholders (peel ports) that own the land and will not help local jobs and local turnover, losing the docks is not in the best interests of the local people and we will lose from the area the opportunity for high skilled jobs with an in the docks instance an average salary of 40k. Jobs to construct houses is not a long term income, once the houses are built, jobs disappear.
This is not in line with local jobs, the businesses turn over 250million pounds in the Chatham docks and this will benefit only the shareholders (peel ports) that own the land and will not help local jobs and local turnover, losing the docks is not in the best interests of the local people and we will lose from the area the opportunity for high skilled jobs with an in the docks instance an average salary of 40k. Jobs to construct houses is not a long term income, once the houses are built, jobs disappear.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.31
Representation ID: 704
Received: 26/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Kevin Shipp
These areas do not have the infrastructure to facilitate the amount of new proposed homes, including but not limited to the road network, doctors, schools, dentists.
These areas do not have the infrastructure to facilitate the amount of new proposed homes, including but not limited to the road network, doctors, schools, dentists.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.50
Representation ID: 705
Received: 26/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Kevin Shipp
If this land is built on it would be a disgrace and against our environmental commitment to future generations.
If this land is built on it would be a disgrace and against our environmental commitment to future generations.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.55
Representation ID: 706
Received: 26/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Kevin Shipp
This is in direct conflict with the fact that Chatham Docks has been included as a potential area for housing, as if the docks land use was re allocated and turned into houses we would lose this land which is already thriving. Don`t get rid of this site as it will not boost jobs and will not support local jobs!
This is in direct conflict with the fact that Chatham Docks has been included as a potential area for housing, as if the docks land use was re allocated and turned into houses we would lose this land which is already thriving. Don`t get rid of this site as it will not boost jobs and will not support local jobs!
