Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Search form responses

Results for Miss Jackie Forrest search

Form ID: 3222

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

The Council could consider setting local standards for development that go beyond national policy/regulations in addressing climate change. What evidence would justify this approach, and what standards would be appropriate?

No development would be best. Keep to urban areas only not green belt or fields.

Do you consider that the Council should seek to go beyond the statutory minimum of a 10% increase in BNG?

What evidence can you provide to support your view?

No answer given

Do you agree that the tariff based strategic approach applied to development within 6 km of the designated areas, supporting the delivery of the Bird Wise SAMMS programme represents an effective means of addressing the potential impact of recreational disturbance on the designated SPA and Ramsar habitats of the Thames, Medway and Swale Estuaries and Marshes.

No not enough, there should be NO development at all in these areas

Do you consider that Medway Council should identify landscapes of local value as an additional designation in the new Local Plan?

Yes, should consider rural areas with sites of local importance no build zones

What should be the criteria for designation? Are there areas that you would identify as justifying a local valued landscape designation – where and why?

Areas of natural beauty and areas with eco systems and wetlands and bird migration and habitats for wildlife etc

Do you agree that the Council should promote Natural England’s Green Infrastructure Framework standards in the Medway Local Plan policy?

Yes

Has the draft Medway Green and Blue Infrastructure Framework identified the correct key issues and assets, and provide effective guidance for strengthening Medway’s green infrastructure?

No, doesn't encompass all the significant areas more research is required.

Do you consider the Green Belt boundary should be revised in line with the recommendations in the 2018 Green Belt Assessment?

Yes

Do you consider that exceptional circumstances exist to justify review of the Green Belt boundary?

Yes

Form ID: 3229

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Should this policy be broadened out to areas adjacent or near to Conservation Areas rather than only within?

Yes

Please explain why

No answer given

Form ID: 3248

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Do you think this policy provides effective guidance on the required housing mix in Medway?

No infrastructure and health facilities not taken into account

Do you agree with having a 10% requirement for affordable housing on urban brownfield sites and 30% requirement for affordable housing on greenfield sites and higher value urban locations?

No, should be no development on greenfield sites

What do you consider would represent an effective alternative approach? Do you agree with a varied approach for affordable housing requirements based on the different value areas across Medway?

No answer given

What do you consider would represent an effective split of tenures between social/affordable rent and intermediate/low-cost home ownership housing in delivering affordable housing?

No answer given

What do you consider would represent an effective split of tenures between social/affordable rent and intermediate/low-cost home ownership housing in delivering affordable housing?

No answer given

Do you have views on defining the limits to over-concentration of HMOs in a community? What criteria would be recommended?

No answer given

Do you have any sites you wish to promote for self-build allocation?

No answer given

Form ID: 3287

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Do you support the approach to manage ancillary development outside of centres in this way?

No answer given

Do you support the approach to protect Medway’s centres by requiring impact assessments in circumstances set out in Policy T17?

No answer given

Do you agree with the proposed Chatham town centre boundary?

No answer given

Do you agree with the identification of the Primary Shopping Area boundary proposed within Chatham town centre?

No answer given

Do you agree with the Rochester district centre boundary proposed?

No answer given

Do you agree with the Primary Shopping Area boundary proposed within Rochester district centre?

No answer given

Which option or combination of options would you choose for the Gillingham district centre boundary?

No answer given

Do you agree with the Primary Shopping Area boundary proposed within Gillingham district centre?

No answer given

Which option or combination of options would you choose for the Strood district centre boundary?

No answer given

Do you agree with the Primary Shopping Area boundary proposed within Strood district centre?

No answer given

Which option or combination of options would you choose for the Rainham district centre boundary?

No answer given

Do you agree with the Primary Shopping Area boundary proposed within Rainham district centre?

No answer given

Would provision of a supermarket in Hoo be beneficial to residents to encourage sustainable travel patterns, convenience and sustainable lifestyles?

No, as it would impact on local shops and business

Do you agree with the boundaries and retention of these listed local and rural centres?

No answer given

Are there any other local and rural centres you may want to suggest for inclusion?

No answer given

Do you agree with the boundaries and retention of the listed shopping parades and neighbourhood centres?

No answer given

Are there any further neighbourhood centres or shopping parades you may want to suggest for inclusion?

No answer given

Do you agree with the proposed boundary for Dockside as a leisure destination? Please refer to the proposal map for the boundary suggestion.

No answer given

Do you support the percentage mix of uses proposed?

No answer given

Can you provide evidence for an alternate mix?

No answer given

Form ID: 3312

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Adequate overnight lorry parking would reduce the risk of lorries parking in locations that lack proper facilities and/or cause a nuisance. Are there local shortages for overnight lorry parking in Medway?

Yes

Form ID: 3330

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Are there any core health and wellbeing issues or opportunities missing from the policy?

Yes

What are examples of healthy development in Medway you would like to see more or less of?

Face to face appointment local surgery opened everyday and weekends

Of those health areas listed, what are the most important for the local plan to address?

Rural

How can the local plan ensure that development is inclusive and accessible for all members of our community, including people with disabilities?

Better access for cars and home visits

Please use the online map to identify a green area for consideration as designated Local Green Space.

No site plotted.

Sport England require an up-to-date PPS to justify the protection, enhancement and provision of playing pitches. Based on an audit and assessment of the supply and demand for existing and future playing pitches, the PPS provides recommendations and an action plan for addressing issues regarding the quantity, quality and accessibility of playing pitches and ancillary facilities. Medway Council’s latest PPS was completed in October 2019 for the period 2018-35. Medway Council is inviting local clubs, national governing bodies of sport and other users and providers to review the latest PPS. More specifically, are there any matters in the latest PPS that should be updated?

No answer given

Do you agree identifying the required infrastructure to support the scale and locations of growth within Medway is the correct approach?

Yrs

Would a ‘mini IDP approach’ focusing on broad locations and strategic sites be preferred? Or do you have an alternative suggested approach?

No answer given

Align infrastructure provision in line with this growth – how can we balance growth and new infrastructure requirements with funding gap?

No answer given

Form ID: 3333

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

In light of the geological/spatial constraints in Medway and predicted limited ongoing need, do you agree that it is appropriate for the Council to plan for the management of non-inert waste that may require landfill on the basis that it will be managed at landfill sites located outside Medway?

Yes

Form ID: 3342

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Are there any core health and wellbeing issues or opportunities missing from the policy?

Yes

Form ID: 3343

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Yes

Form ID: 3345

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Do you support the approach to manage ancillary development outside of centres in this way?

No answer given

Please read the help guide if you are using this consultation platform for the first time.