Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)

Search form responses

Results for Miss Jackie Forrest search

Form ID: 3354

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

The Council could consider setting local standards for development that go beyond national policy/regulations in addressing climate change. What evidence would justify this approach, and what standards would be appropriate?

No development would be best. Keep to urban areas only not green belt or fields.

Do you consider that the Council should seek to go beyond the statutory minimum of a 10% increase in BNG?

What evidence can you provide to support your view?

No answer given

Do you agree that the tariff based strategic approach applied to development within 6 km of the designated areas, supporting the delivery of the Bird Wise SAMMS programme represents an effective means of addressing the potential impact of recreational disturbance on the designated SPA and Ramsar habitats of the Thames, Medway and Swale Estuaries and Marshes.

Do you consider that Medway Council should identify landscapes of local value as an additional designation in the new Local Plan?

Yes

What should be the criteria for designation? Are there areas that you would identify as justifying a local valued landscape designation – where and why?

No answer given

Do you agree that the Council should promote Natural England’s Green Infrastructure Framework standards in the Medway Local Plan policy?

Yes

Has the draft Medway Green and Blue Infrastructure Framework identified the correct key issues and assets, and provide effective guidance for strengthening Medway’s green infrastructure?

No answer given

Do you consider the Green Belt boundary should be revised in line with the recommendations in the 2018 Green Belt Assessment?

Yes

Do you consider that exceptional circumstances exist to justify review of the Green Belt boundary?

Yes

Form ID: 3368

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Do you think this policy provides effective guidance on the required housing mix in Medway?

No infrastructure and health facilities not taken into account

Do you agree with having a 10% requirement for affordable housing on urban brownfield sites and 30% requirement for affordable housing on greenfield sites and higher value urban locations?

No no development on greenfield

What do you consider would represent an effective alternative approach? Do you agree with a varied approach for affordable housing requirements based on the different value areas across Medway?

No answer given

What do you consider would represent an effective split of tenures between social/affordable rent and intermediate/low-cost home ownership housing in delivering affordable housing?

No answer given

What do you consider would represent an effective split of tenures between social/affordable rent and intermediate/low-cost home ownership housing in delivering affordable housing?

No answer given

Do you have views on defining the limits to over-concentration of HMOs in a community? What criteria would be recommended?

No answer given

Do you have any sites you wish to promote for self-build allocation?

No answer given

Form ID: 3369

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Adequate overnight lorry parking would reduce the risk of lorries parking in locations that lack proper facilities and/or cause a nuisance. Are there local shortages for overnight lorry parking in Medway?

Yes

Form ID: 3370

Respondent: Miss Jackie Forrest

Should this policy be broadened out to areas adjacent or near to Conservation Areas rather than only within?

Yes

Please explain why

No answer given

Please read the help guide if you are using this consultation platform for the first time.