Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Search representations
Results for Mr Rupert Turpin search
New searchComment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy DM4: Noise and Light Pollution
Representation ID: 3780
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin
I am all in favour of controlling noise, with the exception of people who go to live in a high street and then complain about live music being too loud on a Friday or Saturday night. We could do with a thriving nightlife economy.
I am all in favour of controlling noise, with the exception of people who go to live in a high street and then complain about live music being too loud on a Friday or Saturday night. We could do with a thriving nightlife economy.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy DM5: Housing Design
Representation ID: 3781
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin
All new houses should have solar panels where possible. Also energy efficiency should be a top consideration.
All new houses should have solar panels where possible. Also energy efficiency should be a top consideration.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy T2: Housing Mix
Representation ID: 3785
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin
We are building far too many flats ( over 50%) This is not good for children and families which Medway has always been strong on. The family friendly promotion is a sham when compared to this vital statistic.
We are building far too many flats ( over 50%) This is not good for children and families which Medway has always been strong on. The family friendly promotion is a sham when compared to this vital statistic.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy S11: Existing Employment Provision
Representation ID: 3797
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin
PeeL PORTS ARE predatory developers buy ports, claim they "unviable "seek change of planning . should not allowed determine that site "unviable" will make up data. they did on job creation by double counting. docks companies provide valuable contribution Medway . they need to know the site remains site for employment not" mixed use " sophistry.
Peel likely take many years to develop site and ask for government handouts and to build large numbers of family unfriendly flats. This will not be a St Mary's Island mark 2, but a high rise dystopian landscape if it ever comes to pass,
PeeL PORTS ARE predatory developers buy ports, claim they "unviable "seek change of planning . should not allowed determine that site "unviable" will make up data. they did on job creation by double counting. docks companies provide valuable contribution Medway . they need to know the site remains site for employment not" mixed use " sophistry.
Peel likely take many years to develop site and ask for government handouts and to build large numbers of family unfriendly flats. This will not be a St Mary's Island mark 2, but a high rise dystopian landscape if it ever comes to pass,
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy S13: Innovation Park Medway
Representation ID: 3800
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin
The council needs to find a way out of being the " lead " here as it is not working.
The council needs to find a way out of being the " lead " here as it is not working.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy T14: Rural Economy
Representation ID: 3801
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin
this will be very difficult if the policy is " It does not conflict with other policies in this plan." some balance is needed otherwise there will always be valid objections.
this will be very difficult if the policy is " It does not conflict with other policies in this plan." some balance is needed otherwise there will always be valid objections.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy S18: Rochester District Centre
Representation ID: 3805
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin
I am worried that the independent shops will be crowded out in favour of convenience stores. Priority should be for independent shops and leisure rather than convenience, and no more take aways please.
I am worried that the independent shops will be crowded out in favour of convenience stores. Priority should be for independent shops and leisure rather than convenience, and no more take aways please.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy T23: Aviation
Representation ID: 3811
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Rupert Turpin
Strongly support this.
Strongly support this.
