Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Search representations
Results for Mr Bryan Fowler search
New searchComment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy S13: Innovation Park Medway
Representation ID: 3763
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Bryan Fowler
Comment made previously. IPM may be near BaE Systems but there are better places. IPM is not readily accessible by Public Transport as much as it should be
Comment made previously. IPM may be near BaE Systems but there are better places. IPM is not readily accessible by Public Transport as much as it should be
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy T13: Tourism, Culture and Visitor Accommodation
Representation ID: 3766
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Bryan Fowler
There is a need for more and better quality hotel accommodation in town centres especially Rochester. A quality assurance unit should be established.
There is a need for more and better quality hotel accommodation in town centres especially Rochester. A quality assurance unit should be established.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy S14: Supporting Medway's culture and creative industries
Representation ID: 3770
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Bryan Fowler
There is a need for more community space in Chatham for larger events. We do not have affordable Church Hall type venues as you expereince in Rochester or Canterbury. Potential venues could include Medway Little Theatre, The Brook, Synagogue, Rochester Independent College. St Johns Church Chatham, must be pursued.
There is a need for more community space in Chatham for larger events. We do not have affordable Church Hall type venues as you expereince in Rochester or Canterbury. Potential venues could include Medway Little Theatre, The Brook, Synagogue, Rochester Independent College. St Johns Church Chatham, must be pursued.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy S16: Hierarchy of Centres
Representation ID: 3777
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Bryan Fowler
Greater emphasis and purpose should be given to developing Chatham's retail offer. Shop occupancy seems to be supplier led rather than a collaborative approach e.g. Why is Sainsbury's proposing a mediocre "top up store". Why are B&M and Wickes seemingly being edged out in favour housing? Why do we have a car centred business in the pedestrain precint of Chatham High High Street
Greater emphasis and purpose should be given to developing Chatham's retail offer. Shop occupancy seems to be supplier led rather than a collaborative approach e.g. Why is Sainsbury's proposing a mediocre "top up store". Why are B&M and Wickes seemingly being edged out in favour housing? Why do we have a car centred business in the pedestrain precint of Chatham High High Street
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy S17: Chatham Town Centre
Representation ID: 3782
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Bryan Fowler
The library as a strategic anchor should be considered. It is an educational asset more than a leisure or communication conduit. Is there any evidence there are strong university links? Chatham Railway station needs a new forecourt which should open out to the bus stops nearby, as originally envisaged.
The library as a strategic anchor should be considered. It is an educational asset more than a leisure or communication conduit. Is there any evidence there are strong university links? Chatham Railway station needs a new forecourt which should open out to the bus stops nearby, as originally envisaged.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy T25: User Hierarchy and Street Design
Representation ID: 3787
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Bryan Fowler
Agree with the hierachy. Flat dweller should have acess to allocated spaces only and no parking permits issued for public car parks except some clearly designated commuter areas.
Agree with the hierachy. Flat dweller should have acess to allocated spaces only and no parking permits issued for public car parks except some clearly designated commuter areas.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2024)
Policy DM19: Vehicle Parking
Representation ID: 3789
Received: 08/09/2024
Respondent: Mr Bryan Fowler
There should be no public parking season ticket permits issued for on-street parking.
There should be no public parking season ticket permits issued for on-street parking.
