Hoo Development Framework

Search form responses

Results for Mrs Katy Jemmotte search

New search New search
Form ID: 96
Respondent: Mrs Katy Jemmotte

Strongly disagree

I believe a few more developments wouldn't hurt but the extensive area that is being proposed is too large. It would affectively remove acres of current farmland and in the current climate we will be needing that. The infrastructure of the roads also will not be able to handle the proposed increase. Stood is already heavily polluted and there is nothing showing how you intend to reduce this. Do you want another London where children are dying of pollution?

As mentioned 1 or 2 more developments I feel can be added however they will bring cars. More pollution, more traffic and nothing to counter it. Landscape lead developments...sadly you have proposed to build so much in this one area you will loose much of that "attractiveness". Also is should be environment led not what it looks like climate change needs thought here.

Somewhat disagree

I agree the area needs development but again I go back to previous comments there is too much of it. Deangate ridge should be no where near any plans for development neither should the farmland on either side of Ropers lane. People move to the countryside for it to stay countryside. But also shooting ourselves in the foot as a country and building over farmland is not the way forward. What will eat? We cannot eat bricks and nicely laid out gardens

Again with the influx of people I see no big plans to cope with the amount of pollution that will come and how to keep children safe from it. There is still only one road in and one road out so how will the traffic stop getting bottlenecked? Will Medway council be providing people with green energy grants so they can upgrade to electric cars? How will you stop litter and dog fouling? I see no mention of Dr Surgery either. There is too much housing being added to one area.

I just don't think it is very well thought out. You have current developments being touted as "country living" when in truth it is not going to be that in a few years time. The plans are too house heavy and again the issue of building over much needed farmland cannot be overlooked. It seems you are thinking about theoretical residents over the current ones and what they want to see and have for their own homes and places they live. I was bought to the area under the premise that it was the countryside and when I bought my house it was, however these plans simply disintegrate what I was sold. Whilst I do not think there shouldn't be ANY further development I think you have way too many houses in your mind and you should work on the current infrastructure before you think of adding any more and destroying valuable farmland and sites of important environmental interest.

Please read the help guide if you are using this consultation platform for the first time.