Hoo Development Framework

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Mrs Alison Wells search

New search

Form ID: 120

Respondent: Mrs Alison Wells

Q1a. To what extent do you agree / disagree with the proposed vision?

Strongly disagree

Q1b. Please explain your answer to Q1a:

I do not believe in the predictions of the vision. Hoo should remain a rural village.

Q2. Please tell us what you think about any aspect of the proposed key principles.

Principle 1. There will be little 'landscape' left due to the predatory and bad developments taking place currently. Principle 2. The HIF project (unlikely to happen) is totally inadequate for the 'Vision' stated in this consultation. Principle 3 and 4. Although good principles in their own right, due to Principle 1 and 2 above they are irrelevant.

Q3a. To what extent do you agree / disagree with the Overall Framework Plan?

Strongly disagree

Q3b. Please explain your answer to Q3a:

If the HDF and SEMS relies on HIF for funding and the HIF project fails, what then? The overall Framework is flawed in most if it's detail to the extent that it is too complex and many local (stress 'local) people will be unwilling or unable to respond to this consultation. Medway Council must be aware that the overwhelming feeling of residents both old and new is that we do not want any further housing development in Hoo, Chattenden and High Halstow and do not accept that it is needed here. Improvements to roads and infrastructure, including services (medical facilities, sports centres, etc.) should take place for the current population and not just for a predicted increase in future numbers.

Q4. Please tell us what you think about any aspect of the proposed neighbourhoods.

Refer to my previous comments.

Q5. Do you have any other comments?

Please read the help guide if you are using this consultation platform for the first time.