Hoo Development Framework

It was announced in Parliament recently that there would be no more top down housing figures, it will be for local Councils to determine their area needs for housing. Is this the policy of the current Prime Minister also ? If so the development on the scale envisaged should not be necessary. I was unable to visit the exhibitions but wish to comment on what I have read. 1. In the Landscape & Sensitivity & Capacity Study it mentions ten land parcels are these incorporated in the Six areas shown planned for development? 2. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY. 1.2 hope all 7 bullet points are observed especially 2,5 & 7. 3. In these troubled times the loss of Farm Land to housing is unacceptable. 4. To rely on Developers contributions for necessary infrastructure i e Dr Surgery, Shops etc. is not reliable as some of the money is not always forthcoming. 5. Why can't the Golf Club be reinstated ? With all the homes proposed surely some of the occupants would want the facility to play golf. Was pleased to read Deangate Ridge sports area has been saved. 6. I ask for no more housing development west of Dux Court Road/ North of Peninsula Way PLEASE. Buffers mentioned in the SEMS would not be adequate to safeguard wildlife especially the endangered Nightingales. SSSI land must be preserved . The area is needed for a buffer against pollution of air quality detrimental to life. Please protect the Lodge Hill area as you are treating the Capstone Valley. 7. KEY GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE :- A shared user bridge will link up existing footpaths and bridleways! We in Frindsbury have been waiting over 20 years for the same to happen in Stonehorse Lane; a promise made broken !!! 8. RAILWAY:- Would hope the railway could have a connection with Strood; with over 2000 jobs coming online at the old Kingsnorth Power Station site it would be an advantage. With just a short new line to connect into the Higham line it would be possible, thereby relieving the roads. Just hope it does not entail loss of peoples homes.