Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Search representations
Results for Mrs Daniela Baylis search
New searchComment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.47
Representation ID: 629
Received: 25/10/2023
Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis
Green belt land is there for a reason. It should be protected at all costs and should be a last resort when considering development. The NPPF requires wholly exceptional reasons for development in the APNB and green belt land. Given that Medway has sufficient housing supply land in non green belt areas these should not even be considered.
Green belt land is there for a reason. It should be protected at all costs and should be a last resort when considering development. The NPPF requires wholly exceptional reasons for development in the APNB and green belt land. Given that Medway has sufficient housing supply land in non green belt areas these should not even be considered.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.48
Representation ID: 630
Received: 25/10/2023
Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis
The Metropolitan greenbelt should be protected
The Metropolitan greenbelt should be protected
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.49
Representation ID: 631
Received: 25/10/2023
Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis
The green belt makes up 5% of land in Medway. this is a very small area and should be protected.
The green belt makes up 5% of land in Medway. this is a very small area and should be protected.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.50
Representation ID: 632
Received: 25/10/2023
Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis
Strongly agree with this statement
Strongly agree with this statement
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.53
Representation ID: 633
Received: 25/10/2023
Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis
I do not think that Medway Council would be able to put forward any landscape impact mitigation's that would compensate for the loss of Greenbelt land in the AONB. Development in these areas would not meet the exceptional circumstances required by the NPPF. Development areas for 38,000 homes have been put forward for a need of 19,000. There is therefore no need to consider green belt land.
I do not think that Medway Council would be able to put forward any landscape impact mitigation's that would compensate for the loss of Greenbelt land in the AONB. Development in these areas would not meet the exceptional circumstances required by the NPPF. Development areas for 38,000 homes have been put forward for a need of 19,000. There is therefore no need to consider green belt land.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.54
Representation ID: 634
Received: 25/10/2023
Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis
there should be no further development along the A228. It is the most dug up road in Medway and has frequent queues causing disruption for any resident unfortunate to live along its length. Nothing that might cause any further increase in traffic along this road should be considered.
there should be no further development along the A228. It is the most dug up road in Medway and has frequent queues causing disruption for any resident unfortunate to live along its length. Nothing that might cause any further increase in traffic along this road should be considered.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.55
Representation ID: 635
Received: 25/10/2023
Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis
sites chosen should be sustainable in travel terms
sites chosen should be sustainable in travel terms
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.56
Representation ID: 636
Received: 25/10/2023
Respondent: Mrs Daniela Baylis
Warehousing and distribution employment activities require good vehicular access and only sites with sufficient vehicular access should be considered.
Warehousing and distribution employment activities require good vehicular access and only sites with sufficient vehicular access should be considered.
