Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Search representations
Results for David Hopkins search
New searchComment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.7
Representation ID: 1295
Received: 30/10/2023
Respondent: David Hopkins
Agreed.
Agreed.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.8
Representation ID: 1297
Received: 30/10/2023
Respondent: David Hopkins
Agree.
Agree.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.10
Representation ID: 1299
Received: 30/10/2023
Respondent: David Hopkins
Agree.
Agree.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.11
Representation ID: 1300
Received: 30/10/2023
Respondent: David Hopkins
Agree. It is important to consider that, in many ways, the Hoo Peninsula is more closely linked to Gravesham than to Chatham and Gillingham.
Agree. It is important to consider that, in many ways, the Hoo Peninsula is more closely linked to Gravesham than to Chatham and Gillingham.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.16
Representation ID: 1301
Received: 30/10/2023
Respondent: David Hopkins
I think the plan should prioritise urban regeneration and high quality rural developments (for example a new village), rather than "tacking on" suburban developments to the existing urban area.
I think the plan should prioritise urban regeneration and high quality rural developments (for example a new village), rather than "tacking on" suburban developments to the existing urban area.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.18
Representation ID: 1303
Received: 30/10/2023
Respondent: David Hopkins
I think that Chatham Docks should be used for housing development as the existing docks are no longer suitable for large vessels and the area could provide good quality housing with access to the river.
I think that Chatham Docks should be used for housing development as the existing docks are no longer suitable for large vessels and the area could provide good quality housing with access to the river.
