Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Search representations
Results for Mr Roger Brown search
New searchComment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.9
Representation ID: 1651
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Roger Brown
This seems to be generated by unsustainable development of the Hoo Peninsula. Clearly demonstrating that the policy of housing dumping on the peninsula.
This seems to be generated by unsustainable development of the Hoo Peninsula. Clearly demonstrating that the policy of housing dumping on the peninsula.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.11
Representation ID: 1652
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Roger Brown
This must be REJECTED without any further discussion.
This must be REJECTED without any further discussion.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.12
Representation ID: 1656
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Roger Brown
This figure is not the real level of local need and is currently under dispute.
This figure is not the real level of local need and is currently under dispute.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.13
Representation ID: 1657
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Roger Brown
This figure contains housing which should not have been approved - an indication of careless unbalanced planning.
This figure contains housing which should not have been approved - an indication of careless unbalanced planning.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.14
Representation ID: 1659
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Roger Brown
Constraints are there for a reason and should not be automatically considered as a negative. Sometimes constraints are valuable to sustainability.
Constraints are there for a reason and should not be automatically considered as a negative. Sometimes constraints are valuable to sustainability.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.15
Representation ID: 1664
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Roger Brown
I don’t accept the scale of the plan to be necessary. If this aspect is accepted then it becomes acceptable like so many of the ecological disasters which are now enveloping our ecosystem.
I don’t accept the scale of the plan to be necessary. If this aspect is accepted then it becomes acceptable like so many of the ecological disasters which are now enveloping our ecosystem.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.16
Representation ID: 1667
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Roger Brown
Green Belt destruction is unacceptable. We should not only have urban regeneration. We need rural regeneration which consists of rewilding land which has been deliberately degenerated by greedy farmers and landowners.
Green Belt destruction is unacceptable. We should not only have urban regeneration. We need rural regeneration which consists of rewilding land which has been deliberately degenerated by greedy farmers and landowners.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.39
Representation ID: 1670
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Roger Brown
Large scale development potentially providing even more housing dumping on the Hoo Peninsula.
Large scale development potentially providing even more housing dumping on the Hoo Peninsula.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.40
Representation ID: 1672
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Roger Brown
Whoever thought up this section clearly has no concept whatsoever of the importance of the Hoo Peninsula as the Green Lung of Medway.
It sounds like the kind of statement made by a certain charlatan liar Prime Minister “ There’s nothing there “ referring to the Peninsula.
Whoever thought up this section clearly has no concept whatsoever of the importance of the Hoo Peninsula as the Green Lung of Medway.
It sounds like the kind of statement made by a certain charlatan liar Prime Minister “ There’s nothing there “ referring to the Peninsula.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.41
Representation ID: 1673
Received: 31/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Roger Brown
I don’t think so!
I don’t think so!