Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
Search representations
Results for Mr Keith Harrison search
New searchComment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.7
Representation ID: 851
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
Is this constraint part of the problem raised by using the Standard Method in assessing housing requirements?
Is this constraint part of the problem raised by using the Standard Method in assessing housing requirements?
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.8
Representation ID: 852
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
Understood.
Understood.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.9
Representation ID: 853
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
The planning of the LTC is more realistic in its assessment growth than the Standard Method.
The planning of the LTC is more realistic in its assessment growth than the Standard Method.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.10
Representation ID: 854
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
Has serious consideration been given to be given to on-going sea level rise and its impact on designated habitats and landscapes over a much longer period than the Local Plan, measured and modelled over centuries rather than decades, and more in keeping with the useful life expectancy of buildings. A large part of Medway forms part of the London flood plain and is considered expendable by higher authority.
Has serious consideration been given to be given to on-going sea level rise and its impact on designated habitats and landscapes over a much longer period than the Local Plan, measured and modelled over centuries rather than decades, and more in keeping with the useful life expectancy of buildings. A large part of Medway forms part of the London flood plain and is considered expendable by higher authority.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.11
Representation ID: 855
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
Is Gravesham's request based on unrealistic housing need?
Is Gravesham's request based on unrealistic housing need?
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.12
Representation ID: 864
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
These figures appear to be far too high.
These figures appear to be far too high.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.13
Representation ID: 865
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
Surely we need far fewer houses to be built, nearer 4,000 than over 28,000.
Surely we need far fewer houses to be built, nearer 4,000 than over 28,000.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.14
Representation ID: 866
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
Most of this work is unnecessary if Medway Council can successfully challenge the Government's estimates.
Most of this work is unnecessary if Medway Council can successfully challenge the Government's estimates.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.15
Representation ID: 867
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
We need to avoid too many expensive new dwellings at the expense of local residents' needs.
We need to avoid too many expensive new dwellings at the expense of local residents' needs.
Comment
Medway Local Plan (Regulation 18, 2023)
5.16
Representation ID: 868
Received: 28/10/2023
Respondent: Mr Keith Harrison
Perhaps these are more useful for assessments in the next century.
Perhaps these are more useful for assessments in the next century.
